A teenager’s personal laptop, a modest birthday gift, became the center of a heated family conflict when their younger brother demanded to use it for gaming. With a powerful new family PC already dominated by the brother, the mother sided with him during her brief need for the computer—forcing the teen to give up their device and physically slamming it shut in anger.
The situation escalated into damaged property and potential injury, leaving the teen labeled ungrateful for refusing to share. This incident exposes deeper issues of favoritism, respect for personal boundaries, and concerning parental reactions when faced with sibling demands.

‘AITA for not telling my mother that my brother can’t use MY laptop?’
A reliable old Lenovo laptop serves as one teen’s personal property amid family gaming tensions.


The brother’s frustration boiled over when their mother needed the family PC, leading to demands on the teen’s laptop.


Past aggression from the mother resurfaced, resulting in the laptop being confiscated after refusal.

This story centers on a clear violation of personal property rights compounded by favoritism and physical aggression in parenting. The laptop, explicitly a gift to the teen, remains their sole possession—yet family dynamics treat it as communal when convenient for the favored younger sibling. What makes the story more complicated is the mother’s use of force to enforce sharing, risking injury and damaging the device.
Some might argue parents have authority to mandate sharing among children for harmony. However, the wider perspective highlights that respecting individual gifts teaches responsibility and boundaries, especially as teens approach adulthood. Physical actions like slamming a laptop on hands constitute abuse, not discipline, and excusing the brother’s destructive tantrum enables poor behavior.
Prioritizing one child’s entertainment over another’s property and safety creates resentment and unsafe environments. Open communication with the father, password protection, and professional support if abuse persists are crucial steps toward fairness and protection.
Here’s what Redditors had to say:
Many users firmly backed the teen, emphasizing ownership rights and condemning the physical aggression.

![[Reddit User] − If you needed to use the expensive family computer and your brother was on it, would he let you use it?](https://loknam.com/aita/images/8ddf8fb301/wp-editor-1767845673280-2.webp)




Several commenters raised serious concerns about abuse, urging the teen to seek help and protect themselves.












A few added practical or light observations, including doubt about the laptop’s suitability for the games.
![[Reddit User] − NTA 100% Good luck. Protect your stuff.](https://loknam.com/aita/images/8ddf8fb301/wp-editor-1767845734643-1.webp)
![[Reddit User] − Nope. And for the record none of those games would’ve worked on ur laptop](https://loknam.com/aita/images/8ddf8fb301/wp-editor-1767845736317-2.webp)
The community unanimously agreed the teen is not at fault for protecting their personal gift, with many highlighting the mother’s actions as abusive and the brother’s behavior as unchecked. Standing firm on boundaries is validated, especially when sharing risks damage or harm.
Have you dealt with family favoritism over shared or personal items growing up? How did you handle demands to give up your things to siblings? Drop your stories below!





